There are really two topics at issue here, Olson told me: martial law and the Insurrection Act of 1807. Moreover, Trump's other advisers in the Friday meeting reportedly opposed the plan in forceful terms, and a statement from Army leadership the same day made clear the military would take no role "in determining the outcome of an American election." streets, scooping up voting machines and tossing anyone who objects before a military tribunal. The president reportedly expressed interest in Flynn's idea.Ĭould this actually happen? Though it may simply be normalcy bias at work, I can't really imagine federal troops marching through U.S. And then there's Trump himself, who met with Flynn and other allies in the Oval Office this past Friday. Lin Wood, an attorney who sued to prevent the certification of the Georgia presidential election results, tweeted Saturday that "atriots are praying" Trump will "impose martial law in disputed states." Commenters at TheDonald.win, an online forum for supporters of the president, thrilled at the idea of a "mostly peaceful martial law declaration" but wondered, absurdly, whether it would accommodate their teenagers' travel home from college or their wives' scheduled c-sections. Thus, the evidence shows that the claim is false and unsubstantiated.Flynn isn't alone in his open enthusiasm for precisely the military junta scenario the president's supporters have spent four years dismissing as a fever dream of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Moreover, Trump talked about a smooth transition in a January 7 speech after the Capitol riots. Given the degree of confusion over the term, some within the media or the government itself might even call it martial law."Īt the time of writing, there is no evidence that Trump will invoke martial law, and no credible evidence shows that he has been preparing to do so. To some observers, a deployment of troops under the Insurrection Act might look and feel very much like martial law. People accused of crimes are brought before military tribunals rather than ordinary civilian courts. Policy decisions are made by military officers rather than elected officials. Laws are enforced by soldiers rather than local police. What should be clear, however, is that the president lacks the authority to declare it." Giving a general definition of the term, the center says martial law "describes a power that, in an emergency, allows the military to push aside civilian authorities and exercise jurisdiction over the population of a particular area. So, basically, what I’m trying to tell you is, you need to be prepared for there to be a martial law declaration."Īccording to a report by Brennan Center for Justice, "The concept has never been well understood. What level, what degree of martial law? Whatever they have to do to bring things under a corrective mode. We are going to see martial law declared. This is coming straight from my contacts in D.C., ya’ll. We are looking imminently - and when I say imminently, I’m talking about the next two or three days - we’re looking at a martial law being declared. In the video, the pastor said: "I have got a lot of contacts the lord has helped me build over the last few years, and those contacts are people who have given me intelligence and given me information that has to do with our nation and it’s future, so I could use it for Bible prophecy teaching. Snopes accessed the video before it was taken down. The video went viral very quickly before Facebook could remove it. Trump has not indicated that he will impose martial law to prevent Joe Biden from being sworn in on January 20.Ī pastor from Texas, Wade McKinney, went on Facebook Live on January 9 to claim that anonymous sources had told him that the outgoing president, Donald Trump, would declare “martial law” before President-elect Joe Biden's inauguration on January 20, 2021.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |